The Montana law defines “sex” in state law when referring to a person as only male or female. However, District Court Judge Shane Vannatta claims this law is “unconstitutional.” The judge argues that the law’s description did not explicitly state its purpose. Judge Vannatta struck down the 2023 law on Tuesday. The ruling came after a group of plaintiffs who identify as “transgender,” “nonbinary,” “intersex,” and “other identities” sued the state. The plaintiffs argue that the law denies legal recognition and protection to people who “identify” as “gender-nonconforming,” according to The Associated Press. Vannatta did not address the claim of a lack of legal recognition and protection but did say that the bill’s title did not adequately explain whether the word “sex” referred to gender or sexual intercourse.The judge probably couldn't define it either way...
Thursday, June 27, 2024
By Definition
Sex isn't sex according to a judge:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Music Mania
Music still matters: The state-funded University of North Texas went after Prof. Timothy Jackson, and the case eventually involved TX Attorn...
-
No more nuke subsidies: For decades, governments have offered taxpayer subsidies to support existing energy sources or to develop new ones, ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
New Orleans is full of DEI: The New Orleans FBI Field Office has aggressively promoted diversity initiatives on social media, especially in ...
No comments:
Post a Comment