Imaginary Change

The "science" isn't real after all:

“The premise of this study is that the climatic system is very complex and subject to perpetual change due to numerous processes, either internal or external to it,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “The fact that one of them, namely the relationship of climate with atmospheric CO2, is highlighted in the last decades does not correspond to its actual importance as a climate driver. The promoted importance is a non-scientific issue, related to the narrative that humans, through their emissions by fossil fuel burning, are responsible for the changes we see in climate.” The study stated that there are political and economic forces driving the propagation of the anti-CO2 narrative under the guise of science. “While causality is a fundamental notion in science and life, there also exist fundamental problems on philosophical, scientific and practical grounds, in its essence and its identification [1]. These problems are manifested in controversies, which are not only theoretical but have important social, political, and economic implications. Some of the most controversial issues of our time are related to Earth’s climate, not excluding the causal relationship between atmospheric temperature (T) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.

There is a lot of hot air in claims over hotter air...