Fischer explains, “The Supreme Court’s definition of what constitutes an ‘official act’ is broad. Even conduct in the ‘outer perimeter’ of the President’s duties is ‘presumptively immune’ and cannot be used in a trial ‘even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct.'” Bragg, predictably, has opposed that argument in Trump’s request to dismiss the conviction, saying the then-candidate directed his former attorney to make a six-figure payment to an adult film star to quell rumors of a possible extramarital affair. “Bragg’s prosecutors, however, introduced substantial evidence at trial that clearly falls under the rubric of ‘official acts.’ (The alleged crime took place when Donald Trump was president.),” Fischer continued in an op-ed on reporter Julie Kelly’s Substack page.No crime, no time...
Tuesday, August 27, 2024
Case Dismissal
Trump's conviction could be overturned:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gender Benders
Democrats still don't get it: An American Principles Project poll looking at the impact of campaign ads on various transvestite-related ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
First it was the eggs: Last month, "Arabica coffee prices hit an eye-watering new high on the Intercontinental Exchange at $3.48 a poun...
-
Advertisers return: AdWeek reports that after pausing their campaigns on X (formerly Twitter) in November 2023 due to concerns over their ad...
No comments:
Post a Comment