On the one hand, we have statements by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that approved all these wind farms that they will have little or no impact worldwide on carbon output and airborne pollution. But scientists believe they will have a potentially massive, harmful effect on the ocean environment. We also have statements from Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry over the years admitting that “If all the industrial nations went down to zero emission ... it wouldn't be enough. Not when more than 65% of the world's carbon pollution comes from the developing world.” Also, every study I know of that has been done on wind power, such as the ERCOT Bentek IV study on the impact of 2,300 wind turbines on the Texas grid, has reported virtually zero reduction of carbon and fossil fuel use because intermittent wind requires fossil fuel plants to ramp up and down to keep voltage constant. Meanwhile, a number of new U.S.-designed modular nuclear power reactors are now in production in several countries, and can produce far more power, all without creating waste fuel or emissions of any kind. In the interim, of course, natural gas is needed to allow faster replacement of coal use.Wind went nowhere fast...
Sunday, October 13, 2024
Wind Woes
Wind goes bust:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gender Benders
Democrats still don't get it: An American Principles Project poll looking at the impact of campaign ads on various transvestite-related ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
First it was the eggs: Last month, "Arabica coffee prices hit an eye-watering new high on the Intercontinental Exchange at $3.48 a poun...
-
Advertisers return: AdWeek reports that after pausing their campaigns on X (formerly Twitter) in November 2023 due to concerns over their ad...
No comments:
Post a Comment