Of the 290 people who answered the survey question, 16 percent indicated that they think the criticisms are “invalid” and should not be acted upon. Fifteen percent said that while “some criticisms may be valid,” no action should be taken right now “because it would undermine university autonomy.” But nearly half of respondents — 47 percent — answered that some criticisms are “valid” and that action should be taken “deliberately through regular governance processes.” An additional 16 percent agreed that some criticisms are well-founded and think that “we should take action urgently.” .... The academy “decided some time ago, but with a big increase in energy and intensity in 2020, to use the accumulated authority and prestige of our institutions and disciplines to advance ideologically driven political agendas, and we told the lie to others (and often to ourselves) that that wasn’t what we were doing,” one faculty member wrote... Put a bit blunter, by another faculty member: “Universities are under attack (often by idiots), but they deserve it and should get their houses in order.”It's well past time to listen to the "idiots..."
Friday, May 23, 2025
Bozo Time
Berkeley finally admits it might have a problem:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gender Benders
Democrats still don't get it: An American Principles Project poll looking at the impact of campaign ads on various transvestite-related ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
First it was the eggs: Last month, "Arabica coffee prices hit an eye-watering new high on the Intercontinental Exchange at $3.48 a poun...
-
Advertisers return: AdWeek reports that after pausing their campaigns on X (formerly Twitter) in November 2023 due to concerns over their ad...
No comments:
Post a Comment