Of the 290 people who answered the survey question, 16 percent indicated that they think the criticisms are “invalid” and should not be acted upon. Fifteen percent said that while “some criticisms may be valid,” no action should be taken right now “because it would undermine university autonomy.” But nearly half of respondents — 47 percent — answered that some criticisms are “valid” and that action should be taken “deliberately through regular governance processes.” An additional 16 percent agreed that some criticisms are well-founded and think that “we should take action urgently.” .... The academy “decided some time ago, but with a big increase in energy and intensity in 2020, to use the accumulated authority and prestige of our institutions and disciplines to advance ideologically driven political agendas, and we told the lie to others (and often to ourselves) that that wasn’t what we were doing,” one faculty member wrote... Put a bit blunter, by another faculty member: “Universities are under attack (often by idiots), but they deserve it and should get their houses in order.”It's well past time to listen to the "idiots..."
Friday, May 23, 2025
Bozo Time
Berkeley finally admits it might have a problem:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Music Mania
Music still matters: The state-funded University of North Texas went after Prof. Timothy Jackson, and the case eventually involved TX Attorn...
-
No more nuke subsidies: For decades, governments have offered taxpayer subsidies to support existing energy sources or to develop new ones, ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
New Orleans is full of DEI: The New Orleans FBI Field Office has aggressively promoted diversity initiatives on social media, especially in ...
No comments:
Post a Comment