These studies reviewed thousands of climate papers but excluded the majority that took no position on warming's causes—66-69% in each case. By only counting papers that endorsed anthropogenic global warming (AGW), they artificially inflated consensus figures to 97-99%. This ignores neutral research and forces scientists to include AGW disclaimers in unrelated studies just to get published. Worse, these studies measure consensus in literature, not among scientists. A 2016 survey of American Meteorological Society (AMS) members reveals the truth: 96% agree climate change is happening, and 67% say humans are a major factor. But there's no consensus that all warming is man-made or dangerous—many see mixed or beneficial impacts. Climate alarmists often cite organizations like AMS or NASA without evidence. Yet, as shown, disagreement among experts is significant. The real debate isn't about climate change existing; it's about its causes, extent, and risks. Claims of overwhelming agreement are overblown and used to stifle discussion.Maybe that's why they all claim to "agree..."
Sunday, June 1, 2025
Climate Claims
No, not all scientists agree:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
People Pause
The world's population isn't growing: For decades, we’ve been told that the world’s biggest problem is too many people. From Malthus...
No comments:
Post a Comment