The question stemmed from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s federal election interference case in which he charged former President Trump with conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Those charges stem from Smith’s months-long investigation into whether Trump was involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and any alleged interference in the 2020 election result. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges and argued he should be immune from prosecution from official acts done as president of the U.S. Smith’s case against the former president and its trial have been pending amid the high court’s consideration of the issue. The justices heard arguments from Trump attorney John Sauer and Michael Dreeben, a Justice Department attorney representing Special Counsel Jack Smith, on April 25 on whether presidents should have "absolute immunity."Trump has been innoculated against idiocy...
Monday, July 1, 2024
The Immunity Sydrome
The Court has ruled:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Music Mania
Music still matters: The state-funded University of North Texas went after Prof. Timothy Jackson, and the case eventually involved TX Attorn...
-
No more nuke subsidies: For decades, governments have offered taxpayer subsidies to support existing energy sources or to develop new ones, ...
-
Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
-
New Orleans is full of DEI: The New Orleans FBI Field Office has aggressively promoted diversity initiatives on social media, especially in ...
No comments:
Post a Comment