Monday, July 1, 2024

The Immunity Sydrome

The Court has ruled:
The question stemmed from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s federal election interference case in which he charged former President Trump with conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Those charges stem from Smith’s months-long investigation into whether Trump was involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and any alleged interference in the 2020 election result. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges and argued he should be immune from prosecution from official acts done as president of the U.S. Smith’s case against the former president and its trial have been pending amid the high court’s consideration of the issue. The justices heard arguments from Trump attorney John Sauer and Michael Dreeben, a Justice Department attorney representing Special Counsel Jack Smith, on April 25 on whether presidents should have "absolute immunity."
Trump has been innoculated against idiocy...
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Gender Benders

Democrats still don't get it: An American Principles Project poll looking at the impact of campaign ads on various transvestite-related ...

  • Bailout Bust
    Another fraudster gets nabbed: “Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Developm...
  • Bad Beans
    First it was the eggs: Last month, "Arabica coffee prices hit an eye-watering new high on the Intercontinental Exchange at $3.48 a poun...
  • Ad Buys
    Advertisers return: AdWeek reports that after pausing their campaigns on X (formerly Twitter) in November 2023 due to concerns over their ad...